<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parallel python and GIS</title>
	<link>http://www.perrygeo.net/wordpress/?p=82</link>
	<description>Matt Perry's random adventures with geospatial technology and other tangentially related topics</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 17:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: perrygeo</title>
		<link>http://www.perrygeo.net/wordpress/?p=82#comment-33735</link>
		<dc:creator>perrygeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.perrygeo.net/wordpress/?p=82#comment-33735</guid>
		<description>Well, C/C++, C#/.NET,  python, perl, ruby and java are really the only languages that have the libraries I need in the geospatial realm. And they're all adequate at best with regards to concurrency. Personally, I think that threads and shared memory are not the best way to go so I'm looking at a message-passing paradigm. Unfortunately Erlang and other functional languages that excel at this type of concurrency have very little ability to process spatial data sources. 

MPI looks good as well though it is not quite as easy to set up as I would hope. PP really shines at ease of installation which is a must if you're going to distribute the apps to less technically-oriented users.

EC2 looks like a neat option to try this out. If I get some free time, I'll have to try it out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, C/C++, C#/.NET,  python, perl, ruby and java are really the only languages that have the libraries I need in the geospatial realm. And they&#8217;re all adequate at best with regards to concurrency. Personally, I think that threads and shared memory are not the best way to go so I&#8217;m looking at a message-passing paradigm. Unfortunately Erlang and other functional languages that excel at this type of concurrency have very little ability to process spatial data sources. </p>
<p>MPI looks good as well though it is not quite as easy to set up as I would hope. PP really shines at ease of installation which is a must if you&#8217;re going to distribute the apps to less technically-oriented users.</p>
<p>EC2 looks like a neat option to try this out. If I get some free time, I&#8217;ll have to try it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.perrygeo.net/wordpress/?p=82#comment-33726</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.perrygeo.net/wordpress/?p=82#comment-33726</guid>
		<description>If you are using multiple machines, considering using MPI or PVM to distribute the processing. Yeah, there are even Python interfaces (e.g. http://sourceforge.net/projects/pympi/). Trying out Amazon's EC2 Web Services for this is certainly an interesting option.

There are *many* possibilities for taking advantage of multi-core/multi-processor computing as long as you keep an open mind and don't restrict yourself to using only Python.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are using multiple machines, considering using MPI or PVM to distribute the processing. Yeah, there are even Python interfaces (e.g. <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/pympi/" rel="nofollow">http://sourceforge.net/projects/pympi/</a>). Trying out Amazon&#8217;s EC2 Web Services for this is certainly an interesting option.</p>
<p>There are *many* possibilities for taking advantage of multi-core/multi-processor computing as long as you keep an open mind and don&#8217;t restrict yourself to using only Python.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bissett</title>
		<link>http://www.perrygeo.net/wordpress/?p=82#comment-33704</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bissett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.perrygeo.net/wordpress/?p=82#comment-33704</guid>
		<description>Have you thought of trying Amazon Web Services EC2?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you thought of trying Amazon Web Services EC2?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.450 seconds -->
